Do Rainbows Really have Only 7 Colours?

Fake Rainbow Looks bad. I don’t like it. It hurts my eyes to look at. but hey, the landscape is nice…

Hey. This is one of those things that has so many strings attached to it, doesn’t it? With God promising not to do the whole flood again. As well as the It being the ‘Queer’ (LGBTIQ…) Community’s flag or whatever you call it. Anyway, I always find that many depictions of rainbows are downright unappealing. especially those ones. They look wrong. I guess I fit under that umbrella of people. too bad. take your umbrella somewhere else! I’m fine with being drenched, thank you! (eh? you insist? Oh, alright then! Just don’t get the wrong idea!)

I guess People can’t replicate it properly. Or perhaps they don’t understand it well enough? I always found it ironic to use a rainbow to describe Freedom of expression. A rainbow is structured, ordered. Everything in it’s proper place. But I find that a real one is drasticly different.

So I thought to myself. Why is that? Is there really only 7 colours in there, or is there more? I’ve often looked at one and decided there is colours after violet, or perhaps a silver band between blue and violet. But that’s not what we are taught,  is it? Courtesy of Wikipedia, Have a look at this:Prism_compare_rainbow_01

The First line Is the idealised rainbow. the second a real one. and the third a computer recreation of the second. So take it with a grain of salt. it is obviously working with certain assumptions. But Looking at one with my own eyes, I could swear I can see colours after it is supposed to have ended, among other things. I feel like Someone or something is trying to keep us away from understanding something.


I’m going to start discussing metaphysics, sorry. If you are not into that, well, too bad! :D. I’ve talked about the Chakra system, And my disdain for it. But eh, I’m just being bitter about being lonely sometimes. it makes me feel better. just like the rainbow, it works on the principle of 7. It annoys me so much because it is unfinished! Not to mention why must they insist on breaking reality into little pieces and give it names! “No, red, you aren’t orange. Get back in your corner”. Oh, the arrogance. The reality is there is no line. they are all the same. the same white light. If anything, A rainbow seems to be primarily composed of: Red, Yellow, Blue, and A bit of purple. the rest are simply emergent colours. hence why older depictions look like this:1280px-Joseph_Anton_Koch_006

But 7 isn’t divine. It is limiting. it’s a 45 degree turn right away from wherever you were heading. literally. And As for the six based sacred geometry, Have a think about how one writes a six. You start at the top, and work in. It’s a energy that goes into itself, a loops of sorts. almost parasitic, if the energy came from somewhere else. Just like the geometry I Have discussed in previous posts. it is supposedly the patterns of creation. But whom’s Creation is it?94xNxlearn-to-write-number-6.jpg.pagespeed.ic.HRDWQwM-RS

the Divine creator, Or a Cheap Imitation? One that must recycle itself and repeat and repeat because it is not self-propelling. it must consume itself and others. I know this is the case. My instincts tell me it is, and so does the evidence. anyway, eight is better, but still not quite right. have a look at this sequence:

“Any dedicated seeker of truth eventually stumbles upon the incredible symmetry and structure of mathematics, which is especially true in fractal geometry involving the integers 1-9.  For a most basic example, just take a look at these nine equations:”

(1 x 8) + 1= 9

(12 x 8) + 2 = 98

(123 x 8) + 3 = 987

(1234 x 8) + 4 = 9876

(12345 x 8) + 5 = 98765

(123456 x 8) + 6 = 987654

(1234567 x 8) + 7 = 9876543

(12345678 x 8) + 8 = 98765432

(123456789 x 8) + 9 = 987654321

-Taken From Here. Fascinating, Isn’t it! yeah. oh, I’m sorry. I get a bit carried away. or I’m making another dumb joke. yeah. hmm, Food… I’l be back. Yeah, the path of the genuine seeker is hard. nine is the last number, after all. Occam’s razor strikes again! The Fibonacci sequence is the epitome of the Parasitic Geometry. 7069751_424ac5ee6a_mI mean, Which one appeals to you more? The
Fibonacci Looks plain wrong compared to the genuine thing. Nine seems to Expend when used. The way it is drawn supports this. although I dislike the way it is drawn in that image. drat. I’l have to do it myself.

Nine ExpandingThere we a5812f2c0f9ed4fe46ce0ba7b647f275are. Pretty simple, really. Just don’t ask how many hours we thought about it. That’s not the point. Oh, we were supposed to talk about rainbows? yeah, right. The Chakra system. I ran across A thirteen Chakra system, which aligned with my thoughts exactly. there is a golden Chakra exactly where I Imagined it to be. They even have the Chin chakra, but called it the mouth. Finally. A decent system. The 13 Chakra System. Hey, thirteen is considered to be an unlucky number, right? why is that? now I’m worried. eh, get rid of the last one. problem solved :). it’s outside the body anyway. It makes my head hurt thinking about all the possibilities.


Well, Thanks for reading.



4 thoughts on “Do Rainbows Really have Only 7 Colours?

  1. Hey Sage, I’m nobody so it probably doesn’t matter what I think. But I see the magic # being 0. Not zero, but NOTHING. This is why, no matter what you multiply it by, it always remains the same. Realizing this, I began to understand that the second, my generation was labeled generation x(NOTHING), it signaled that is ready to be aligned. Just my 2 cents. #NOTHINGMatters

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Hmm. Interesting. Now I’m thinking about zero-point energy, Aether, and so on. Now we will have to make a post about that as well! sigh.
      I honestly forgot all about ZERO. But when you say nothing matters, I always find myself thinking that Nothing is important. ie: Nothing is important.

      As Above, So Below, As Within, So Without. In the Miracle of the one thing. That comes to mind as well. Zero Is Eternal. That which form springs from.

      Tee hee, I’m channelling my higher self again, I think. opps.

      Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s